Come and work with us!

Sheffield Hallam University

My department at Sheffield Hallam University – the Department of Media Arts and Communication – has a number of vacancies at present and we would love some lovely people to come and join us. Details are available on the University Website. There are also jobs in other departments and faculties if you’re not a media type – but then you wouldn’t get the benefit of working with me on a daily basis.

You would get to work in the swishy building in the picture! You would get to work at a university with great facilities and lovely students and colleagues! You’d get to work on a campus surrounded by several awesome independent pubs and cafes that will happily take your salary off your hands! You’d get to be in Sheffield with its fantastic festivals, theatres and pubs, proximity to the Peak District and many hills! You’d get me nagging you about your modules and the paperwork associated with them the benefits of working with me!

For the interested, the four vacancies we’ve got going are all at a Lecturer/Senior Lecturer level (depending on experience):

  • 1.0 FTE Public Relations
  • 1.0 FTE Media (theory)
  • 0.6 FTE Media (practice – with experience in video and/or film)
  • 0.5 FTE Sports Journalism

Details of all entry requirements etc can be found with the job adverts. Applications close late August. I’m happy to be contacted with questions about the vacancies until the middle of August (you can access my details under the contact page), or email the Deputy Head of Department, Geff Green, on g.c.green@shu.ac.uk

UCU ‘Stamp out casual contracts’ day

stampout_logo_225x155

Today (May 7) is UCU’s Stamp Out Casual Contracts day. In the HE sector, a large number of staff are on zero-hour contracts in associate lecturer roles, research roles and so on. UCU is trying to highlight the prevalence of these contracts in the sector and fight against the casualisation of HE – not least as it impacts on student experience – if your lecturers are jobbing at several institutions and not paid to be there for anything other than class time (practice varies wildly from institution to institution – I’ve heard some shocking stories about how these staff are treated at some places – thankfully none of the institutions I have worked for) – then they’re not as available to see you or answer emails. High use of casual staff can also equal high turnover and students seeing several different faces.

That’s not to say all staff in HE should be permanent full-timers – there’s a need for guest lecturers, short-term or low-hours contracts for people like professionals who input into one or two modules a year, PhD students etc – but the problem with zero hours rather than alternative systems is that it is no guarantee of work, in some places this may also mean the organisation doesn’t see itself as having the same obligations or duty of care to these staff, yet staff are seen as being employed to all intents and purposes for organisations like the job centre.

Zero-hours contract jobs have been in the news a lot this week because of the Job Centre declaring that people with zero hour contracts can’t claim benefits. My first reaction to this story was that I was surprised this was a new policy. I’m ‘lucky’ (it seems bizarre that you have to consider yourself ‘lucky’ to have a job, but there we are, this is why days like this exist) in that I have a permanent academic contract. But I didn’t always – I worked variously as an ‘hourly paid’, ‘associate’ or ‘visiting lecturer’ at different institutions, each with different benefits and drawbacks, different expectations and different pay. The flexibility of that work was quite nice, but the insecurity was horrible – never knowing what your income will be that year or when you will actually get paid is terrifying. But the one I want to mention today is about the Job Centre and how it treats people in education (and this does not just apply to HE but any sort of education) on zero hours contracts just as a raising awareness tale.

I worked on zero-hours academic contracts 2006-2011. In 2006 this was alongside another job, but that job came to an end and I got enough work in universities and colleges that it became my sole income. (In Sep 2008 I secured PhD funding which meant my income became more stable until I completed my doctorate in 2011 and secured a permanent job). However, summer 2007 came and I was facing a long time between May and September with no income. I signed up with temp agencies, but in the meantime went to the Job Centre to sign on whilst I waited for the temp agency to provide work. I was told I was not eligible to sign on because I worked in education and people who work in education know that they have a long summer and if they choose to work in that sector, they have to just accept that. I explained I was on a zero hours contract and had no idea if I would get work in September. They said this didn’t matter, I was on the books of those institutions, I was clearly hoping to go back there rather than secure permanent work elsewhere (I guess I could have lied and said I was looking for a permanent job but what good would that have done?) and I was studying for a PhD anyway (part-time) so I would only get JSA if I was prepared to change career and stop studying should a permanent job opportunity arise.

This was under the Labour government so I can only imagine what it’s like under the Coalition. The message was clear: in education, you put up with zero-hours contracts, insecurity and four months of the year with no income, or else you change career. As pretty much the only way into academia is through working on a casual contract first, your choices are essentially presented as either work in a different sector (which is looking even harder if zero-hour contracts are common and equal ‘permanent employment’ to the job centre in other sectors too), or deal with it.

I got temp work that summer, so I only went a couple of weeks without income. Summer 2008 I managed to do so much marking I could afford to live without temping. The quality of my marking was not good enough though – I took on too much, too fast because, as I saw it, I had no choice in the matter if I wanted to pay my rent and eat AND work on my PhD studies.

I am not saying this as a slight against any of my employers – they did what the sector does, and compared to some, I was treated well when on zero hour contracts. But the stresses of those summers and not knowing how I could make ends meet were horrible and terrifying, especially given the Job Centre’s attitude, which now seems to apply to all sectors. So I want to post this today in solidarity with colleagues – in both HE and other sectors – nationally who are fighting for some security in knowing where their living costs will come from – and to highlight that, for many, to get into a career of their choice has so many hurdles, it can feel almost impossible to get there.

Communicated sex and gender

About Time trailer - video

Today I deliver the final ever lecture on my Level 4 module Communicating Sex and Gender – with presentations to come this week and after Easter. It’s a slightly sad moment in a way. I’ve been involved in lots of modules that no longer exist (indeed, we said goodbye to another L4 module, Approaches to Media, in semester 1 and I’ve been on that module since its inception), including as module leader but this is the first module I have really ‘made my own’ over a few years that I’ve actively been involved in killing.

We’re re-approving our undergraduate courses from September and there won’t be any more Level 4 electives. I’m very excited about the new courses and modules – I’m going to be running a Media Audiences module at Level 4 and at Level 5 will be part of the team on Media, Identities and Representations, a new mandatory for Media students that will replace some of the content from Communicating Sex and Gender as well as looking at a range of other issues relating to identities – we’re expecting to change the content yearly to reflect current issues and debated in the media (I would imagine were we to have run it this year we’d have covered Benefits Street, the rise of UKIP, Scottish referendum and equal marriage, for example). So new things are coming, but it’s still kind of sad to lose things.

I’ve been running Communicating Sex and Gender for about four years now, I think, and had taught on it before that. It was a module that originated in Comms studies but over the years has been an elective for Media, PR, Comms and Journalism students. I’ve met some fantastic students through this module, students whose university journeys I’ve been part of until graduation, with many of them taking my other modules, (either by choice or because they had to), and I have worked with a great bunch of associate lecturers.

We’ve covered a whole range of topics from language to the built environment; from selfies to same-sex marriage. This year we managed to cover things such as the #nomakeupselfie and #cockinasock trends, the pros and cons of the Bechdel test, Facebook’s 58 genders (in the US), slutwalks, the Sochi games and LGBT rights, the role of gender in specialist journalism, Gogglebox, Sam Bailey, Robin Thicke, Britpop (just before the BBC announced the 20 year anniversary specials, that’s how zeigeisty I am. Or how living in the past I am), Netflix, Breaking Bad, slutwalks and a bunch of other topics. It’s been a weird year for me as we’ve had fewer students at Level 4 all round and I didn’t have a seminar group, so it has been a bit subdued, but I have enjoyed revising my teaching each year, looking at new developments and seeing students grappling with a range of topics in this area.

So if any of my current or former students are reading – I hope you enjoyed taking this module – I really enjoyed working with you, and I’m looking forward to the challenges the new modules will bring!