This thing weighs a ton

I already have the certificate, in fact it came pretty much the same week I handed the purple thing over – which sort of makes a mockery of graduation, but nonetheless is useful to have.

I assume it’ll turn up in the SHU Learning Centre any day soon and at some point I will try and submit it for their electronic research archive (after writing the three articles/chapters and the conference paper I need to do by the end of June. And after marking is over).

The university asked me to fill something in with my ‘top tips’ for finishing on time, so here’s a copy-and-pasted (self-plagiarism ahoy!) version:

I think for me, finance was the key motivator, as I was self-funded and then research council funded, money is tight and I didn’t want to shell out more than I absolutely had to. I suspect people for whom money isn’t an issue take a lot longer to complete as they don’t have that impetus. Age also helped – I think if I was younger there might seem less of a push, and I think having worked for several years and then come back to study helped me be more motivated – there are pros to studying straight through but I think I was a better student for having not been one for a while (other than my MA which I did as a precursor to the PhD).

I think setting goals with your supervisors is also a good idea, and making sure you have supervisors you get on with and who will offer guidance but also allow you freedom – although I was lucky in that I got to choose my supervisors and examiners (in conjunction with others).

Picking a topic that is diverse enough to sustain you is probably good – my topic had so many facets (probably more than I would recommend for someone else) but that kept me going and something that was more straightforward would have bored me after six months or so.

Read some completed theses both early on and before writing up to know what’s in store.

Posted in Academia, Publications, Religion and Culture | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

Girl on the platform smiled

I’m currently obsessed with thinking about internet platforms and how they operate. It links in a bit with some research I’ve just done on fan communities and another piece I’m about to start, as well as some of the research interests of some of my dissertation students – but it’s also because I must KNOW ALL THE THINGS. Like ‘what on earth IS reddit and why don’t I get it yet?’ or ‘what does it mean when fandoms are on tumblr?’ I raised this last one on the newly-formed Fan Studies list but so far no-one’s even all that sure, other than we’re slightly afraid that the answer might be ‘we only don’t get it because we’re old’ – although Hannah Ellison is making some headway on that one. It’s also something I’m thinking about a lot as I’m one of the team involved with Internet Research 13 and our conference theme is ‘technology’ so I’m interested in it from that side of things as well.

We had an interesting discussion in my first year seminar today along these lines. This week’s theme (it’s a module on gender and sexuality) was how people perform gender/sexuality online and we got onto the nature of different platforms. Some students were talking about the idea that you can be ‘more yourself’ in some anonymous platforms than you can be on Facebook ‘because I’ve got my dad on there’. There were a couple of them who said they followed Tumblrs from people who shared quite personal stuff on there (news to me as I tend to just see Doctor Who and Sims picspam on my dash… but then I still don’t think I’m doing it right) and you didn’t know much about the people posting in terms of their ‘offline’ identity.

The discussions about Facebook were most interesting – everyone said they’d only add friends and acquaintances, and they were happy for people to see photos of them, see them talking about their interests etc. They mostly said they used it as a way of keeping in touch with friends and family – yet they all thought some of their friends ‘overshared’ on the platform and that it wasn’t appropriate to use FB as a site for ‘talking about your feelings’ or even posting too many photos of your kids (etc). So on the one hand, there’s this idea that FB is for people we know, and it’s a site where we’re a version of ourselves that’s attached to our real name and photos of us – and yet on the other hand, we’re being somehow less of ourselves there because we don’t share personal things – even when it’s our loved ones who see it! Their anecdotes reflect my own use of FB but it’s all still rather curious, isn’t it?

We also talked a little about dating being online, which really is my cue to point out again how much I hate that Match advert – not just because of the hipsters (but ugh, hipsters) but also IT MAKES NO SENSE – if you can meet people at the train station, why bother with the internet?

Posted in Cultural studies, Gender and Sexuality, Internet, Online Fandom, Social Networking | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

I love it when a journal issue is interesting

The latest issue of New Media and Society is out and seems to have a cracking range of articles in it.  Limor Shifman’s got an interesting article about YouTube memes (and I cracked up at the mention of Leeroy Jenkins <3 <3 ), there are several articles about mobile phones, e-book readers and Facebook and lots of other interesting looking pieces.  I can feel my 2012/13 module reading lists growing already!

Posted in Cultural studies, Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

The final Make Bradford British ‘tweetcloud’

I still need to take time to go through the tweets (and, er, actually watch the programme properly) but for the interested, this is the shot on the C4 site now Make Bradford British has finished.  The biggest word, ‘humour’, has a total of 54 tweets according to the graphic (although the graphic has a lot of problems as we know).  Several of the blue words have just 1 – some of which are user-generated, some not.

Posted in Britishness, Cultural studies, Religion and Culture | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

Well, it made me laugh…

The latest cartoon from our students’ mag, SHULife:

Posted in SHU | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Britain, Britain, Britain

This afternoon I did the C3Ri research seminar (our research institute has a different person present each week).  I talked about the Britishness angle of my PhD and the way factual TV constructs a sense of national identity in its programmes about religion/spirituality.  I came home tonight to see a trailer for Make Bradford British, C4′s latest reality show (or ‘hard-hitting show’ as their Twitter account calls it) which echoes every single thing my research (and that of others) highlights about religion, ethnicity, Britishness and class.

Only this time they’ve decided to implement social media.  The image is their entirely manufactured Tweet cloud.  They (and I don’t yet know who this ‘they’ is but I intend to find out) set up some accounts specifically to tweet and RT their own definitions of Britishness, which thus make up the flag you see – it is ‘their’ Britishness, not ‘ours’.  The hashtag is monitored to weed out abusive tweets.  But it also apparently weeds out anything that’s non-abusive which doesn’t fit their cloud – i.e. most of the tweets in the stream, as they’re phrases and not single words.  To be fair, maybe the algorithm hasn’t been switched on yet (or whatever happens in technical terms).  But if you look at the hashtag #makesyoubritish you will see an entirely different story to the image presented on the screen.  It seems so far like an epic social media fail.  But then maybe I’m being unkind – the programme doesn’t even start until March 1st and they might be able to tweak things before then.

I’ll be watching – and I’m sure more articles/chapters will come – and to be fair, I will try and contact those involved in production to see if the story behind the whole thing is any less cynical and manufactured than it currently appears…

Posted in Britishness, Religion and Culture, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

New research on TV news

Just heard a great keynote from Steven Barnett and Ivor Gaber about TV news (BBC One early/late evening bulletins, ITV1 late evening, Channel 4 News, Channel 5 News, Sky News 24, BBC News channel).  Their central argument is that TV news is not ‘dumbing down’ and has remained fairly consistent for the last 35 years – you can read the report here.

Posted in Academia, Conferences, Journalism/News, Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

MeCCSA 2012

I hope you all had a good Christmas and New Year. I came back from annual leave with a nasty cold, so bah humbug to that. Anyway from tomorrow til Friday I’m at MeCCSA 2012 in Luton, and I expect I’ll be blogging and tweeting from there during the conference. I am supposed to be presenting on Thursday morning (things got a little hairy with whether or not I was actually going for a while, so things are still a bit TBC). The conference organisers asked for some papers on policy, so that’s what I’ve prepared, and here are my slides, should you be interested:

Posted in Academia, Conferences, Religion and Culture, Television | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

When you realise you’d better get on with it

My friend Jennifer has blogged about the upcoming demise of Twapperkeeper. It seems mad how quickly different Twitter ‘catchers’ vanish – witness the short-lived Google social (“thanks”, Google plus), and the problems various sites have had since Twitter changed its terms earlier this year.

Jennifer’s linked to some other great articles and tools, from Brian Kelly and Martin Hawksey. I still have all those Red Nose Day tweets to sort. Guess the clock’s suddenly started to tick…

Posted in Academia | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Reading the Riots

My friend, fellow academic and all-round wonderwoman Farida Vis is part of a team of academics working with The Guardian on the ‘Reading the Riots’ project.

Farida’s been on the team analysing Twitter to look at discussions around the London riots and there are some very pretty graphics to illustrate their findings over at The Guardian, where you can find a bunch of other articles from people involved in the project, which looks not just at social media, but at many other aspects, including the historical and local contexts.

You can also hear Farida talking about the project via audioboo – unless you’re on an outdated browser like my work one :(

While I’m plugging her work, there’s a website set up for the book she and Mike Thelwall have coming out in 2012, Researching Social Media, which promises to be a good-un, with Mike coming from the computing angle and Farida the media/cultural studies one – a great book for anyone involved in inter-disciplinary work.

Posted in Academia, Social Networking | Tagged , , , | Comments Off